A Humble Plea
Take a look at this paragraph I came across today during my daily reading:
"I've long been an MVC and Java servlet fan. I love object-oriented programming, use REST as a web architectural style, and tend to think of XML-encoded data in entity-relationship terms. So why did I like PHP so much better than Rails?"
So what's wrong with this? Sure, it's a lot of jargon that doesn't make sense unless you've worked with the web for a decent amount of time. I have worked with the web for a decent amount of time and I do understand the jargon. So what's wrong you ask. It's the links! Notice how every jargon word has a link to Wikipedia.
Let me tell you. Linking every second word makes it extremely hard to read your paragraph. Especially for someone like me who speed-reads most web content, this is a huge drawback because a) some words are underlined for reasons other than emphasis, and b) some words are of a different color than the rest of the paragraph. Makes it very very difficult to put together the words in my head to form a coherent sentence.
You may argue that it makes it easier for your reader if he has to only click on a link. Trust me, if you're using firefox, it's really easy to wiki any term. You're already on the browser, you just have to press Ctrl+T to open up a new tab, type in "wiki term" and there you go.
So, please, please, please. A humble plea from my end. If you're a web content provider of any kind, whether a blog owner, an article writer, or a mailing list contributor, please do not insult your readers by linking to Wikipedia. You're making your content harder to read and a fool out of yourself. Everyone these days knows wikipedia. You don't need to show off your elite web skills if you've happened to come across this phenomenon known as wikipedia. I've been using it for years for literally everything I do. Except academic work of course. If I don't understand a term, I have enough common sense to look it up on wikipedia. I don't need to be told.
So next time you link to wikipedia in your blog/article, think twice. Your readers are smarter than you think.
The Perfectionist's Ordeal
There's an old saying, at least in English, that goes something like this:
Don't strive to be a perfectionist.
I agreed with the saying for a very long time. Little did I know I had been in the dark all the while. Sometime back however, a couple of years ago I'd say, I noticed something terribly wrong with the saying. Something funny and bizarre. I couldn't quite put my finger on what was actually wrong. But I knew something was wrong nonetheless.
It then struck me yesterday like a furious bolt of lightening. The darn saying wasn't wrong, it was incomplete!
The actual saying should have been:
Don't strive to be a perfectionist the first time!
That's right folks! The true perfectionist does try to get things right. Just not the first time. The true perfectionist isn't content until he gets it right. If he gets it right the first time, that's great. But if he doesn't, then he doesn't just submit his first try, which is at best mediocre. He keeps working on it constantly until it's perfect. P as in perfect. Not a speck to be seen. To him, a job isn't done until it's well done.
Now don't get me wrong here. I, by no means, am calling myself a perfectionist. Now what credentials do I have to preach about perfectionism, you may ask. None. None at all. My rebuttal: you don't have to be a scientist to teach science.
The perfectionist we're talking about here faces a lot of hurdles in life. Especially from his fellow imperfectionists. Those lazy imperfectionists who are perfectly satisfied with mediocrity. Who contend themselves by being among the crowd, not above. Whose entire lives are defined by mediocrity. For whom perfect is a word unheard of. For whom a perfect job is a blatant oxymoron. Cacophonic and ridiculous.
To the true perfectionist, everything is an optimization problem. Everything. Max cTx subject to ax ≤ b. He's not done until he's reached optimality. And it is at optimality that he is perfect.
Our perfectionist protagonist here has struggled innumerable times. Again and again he tries. He strives to find that one crucial missing ingredient. He is advised, time and again, that he's doing nothing but wasting his time. "Don't be a perfectionist," advises his know-it-all boss. Does our perfectionist protagonist heed his boss's words? Of course not. Nothing detains our resolute protagonist.
I have seen it. It is not easy to be a perfectionist. Not my kind of perfectionist. The true perfectionist.
